Claude API vs OpenAI API

Side-by-side comparison of the Claude API (Anthropic) vs OpenAI API: pricing, context window, tool use, streaming, and migration. With Python code examples.

💥 50p impulse-buy: Power Prompts PDF (first 10 buyers) 30 battle-tested Claude Code prompts · 8-page PDF · paste into CLAUDE.md and never re-type a prompt again · 50p impulse-buy, no commitment

Switching from OpenAI to Claude (or evaluating both)? Here's a practical comparison with real migration code, not marketing copy.

Quick comparison

FeatureClaude API (Anthropic)OpenAI API
Python SDKpip install anthropicpip install openai
Best general modelclaude-sonnet-4-6 ($3/$15)gpt-4o ($2.50/$10)
Fast/cheap modelclaude-haiku-4-5 ($0.80/$4)gpt-4o-mini ($0.15/$0.60)
Max context window200K tokens128K tokens
StreamingYes (server-sent events)Yes (server-sent events)
Tool / function callingYes (tools param)Yes (tools param)
Vision / image inputYes (URL or base64)Yes (URL or base64)
JSON modePrompt-based or tool useNative JSON mode flag
Prompt cachingYes (native, significant savings)No native caching
Batch APIYes (50% discount, async)Yes (50% discount, async)

OpenAI → Claude migration (Python)

# BEFORE (OpenAI)
from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI()  # reads OPENAI_API_KEY

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this text in 3 bullet points."}
    ]
)
print(response.choices[0].message.content)
# AFTER (Claude / Anthropic)
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()  # reads ANTHROPIC_API_KEY

response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system="You are a helpful assistant.",   # ← top-level, not in messages[]
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Summarize this text in 3 bullet points."}
    ]
)
print(response.content[0].text)

Key API differences

Tool use migration example

# BEFORE (OpenAI function calling)
response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="gpt-4o",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the weather in Paris?"}],
    tools=[{
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": "get_weather",
            "description": "Get current weather for a city",
            "parameters": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}},
                "required": ["city"]
            }
        }
    }]
)
tool_call = response.choices[0].message.tool_calls[0]
print(tool_call.function.name, tool_call.function.arguments)
# AFTER (Claude tool use)
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "What is the weather in Paris?"}],
    tools=[{
        "name": "get_weather",
        "description": "Get current weather for a city",
        "input_schema": {
            "type": "object",
            "properties": {"city": {"type": "string"}},
            "required": ["city"]
        }
    }]
)
for block in response.content:
    if block.type == "tool_use":
        print(block.name, block.input)  # {"city": "Paris"}

When to choose Claude over OpenAI

Use the Claude Cost Calculator to estimate API costs for your specific usage pattern. See Python quickstart to get started immediately.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Claude API compatible with the OpenAI API?
Not directly. The Anthropic SDK uses a different endpoint, SDK, and message format. However, migration is straightforward: replace `from openai import OpenAI` with `import anthropic`, swap the client init, and adjust the `messages.create` call. Most Python patterns translate line-for-line.
How does Claude's pricing compare to GPT-4o?
As of 2026, claude-sonnet-4-6 costs $3/$15 per million input/output tokens. GPT-4o is $2.50/$10. Haiku 4.5 ($0.80/$4) is cheaper than GPT-4o mini ($0.15/$0.60) for long-context tasks because of its 200K context window. Always use the official pricing pages to verify current rates.
Which has a longer context window — Claude or OpenAI?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7 both support 200K token context windows (roughly 150,000 words). GPT-4o supports 128K. For tasks that need to process entire codebases, books, or long documents, Claude's context advantage is significant.
Does Claude support function calling / tool use like OpenAI?
Yes. Claude calls them 'tools' rather than 'functions', but the concept is identical: you pass a list of tool definitions with JSON Schema inputs, and the model returns a tool_use block when it wants to call one. The main difference is that Claude uses `tool_use` content blocks instead of OpenAI's `function_call` field.
Which API is better for coding tasks?
Both perform well on coding benchmarks. Claude tends to produce longer, more thoroughly commented code and excels at refactoring and code review due to its large context window. OpenAI's models often have stronger ecosystem integrations. For pure code generation, try both on your specific task — results vary by domain.

Free tools

Cost Calculator → API Cookbook → Diff Summarizer → Skills Browser →

More examples

Claude API Python QuickstartClaude API Node.js / TypeScript QuickstartClaude API Streaming in PythonClaude API Streaming in Node.js / TypeScriptClaude API Tool Use in PythonClaude API Tool Use in Node.js / TypeScript